Anticipatory/bail application of the accused-petitioner was not pressed by his counsel; the High Court accordingly dismissed the application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:45544]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5401/2024
Navratan Singh S/o Bhajan Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Barakhur, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Singh Bikarwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Judgment / Order
04/11/2024
fo}ku~ vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr tekur ;kfpdk dks izsl djuk ugha pkgrs gSaA
vr% tekur ;kfpdk uksV izsl esa fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
MOHIT/ 74
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be pressed by counsel for the accused-petitioner.
Navratan Singh S/o Bhajan Lal
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
