Allowed

Jasveer @ Veera S/O Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Jan 2024CRLMB/91/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under the Rajasthan Excise Act and IPC, considering his long confinement in judicial custody and the prospect of a prolonged trial, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Jasveer @ Veera S/O Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2569]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

91/2024

¶5

Jasveer @ Veera S/o Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Footaki, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal, Adv. For : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

16/01/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.371/2023 registered at Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 16/54 Rajasthan Excise Act & 379, 411, 420, 483 of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits

[2024:RJ-JP:2569]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-91/2024]

that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Jasveer @ Veera S/o Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

YOGESH KUMAR /126

Jasveer @ Veera S/O Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jasveer @ Veera S/O Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Moharsingh S/O Kajod Vs State of Rajasthan

Imran Hussain S/O Shri Sajid Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Himansh @ Himanshu Verma S/O Shri Kanwar Ajay Verma Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Rajesh S/O Shri Bhagwan Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ramniwas S/O Kishori Vs State of Rajasthan

Jai Prakash @ Pintoo S/O Shri Heeralal Vs State of Rajasthan