Allowed

Harphool S/O Shri Mahadev v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2024CRLMB/16340/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a cheating and forgery case arising from FIR No.105/2023. The charge-sheet had been filed and the petitioner was in custody since long. Considering the overall facts without commenting on merits, the court enlarged the petitioner on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Harphool S/O Shri Mahadev Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2725]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

16340/2023

¶5

Harphool S/o Shri Mahadev, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Bagawas Chaurasi, Police Station Bhabru, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur.)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Swami, R/o 108, Shiva Nagar, 4Th Macheda Simar Road, Harmada, Jaipur, Presently Additional Dp Dak Shahpura, Jaipur Rural.

¶10

Mangali Devi W/o Govind Ram Bunakar, R/o Bagawas Chourasi, Sub District Viratnagar, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hashim Khan, Adv., for Mr. Mohd. Shakir Khan, Adv. For : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, Respondent(s) P.P. Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶14

Judgment / Order

¶15

17/01/2024

¶16

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.105/2023 registered at Police Station

¶17

[2024:RJ-JP:2725]

¶18

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-16340/2023]

¶19

Bhabru, District Jaipur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 of IPC.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶21

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶22

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶23

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Harphool S/o Shri Mahadev shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent

¶24

[2024:RJ-JP:2725]

¶25

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-16340/2023]

¶26

dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

¶27

so.

¶28

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶29

YOGESH KUMAR /82

Harphool S/O Shri Mahadev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harphool S/O Shri Mahadev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra S/O Jagdish Prasad Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vishal S/O Pappu Vs the State of Rajasthan

Jasveer @ Veera S/O Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam Khan S/O Kamruddin Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ghanshyam S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Bahadur Singh @ Katappa S/O Narendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan