The anticipated bail application filed by the accused-petitioner was dismissed by the High Court of Rajasthan as it was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4500/2024
Satish Kumar S/o Deshram, R/o Lakhimpur, Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar Dabas, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
09/05/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.
Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner stands dismissed as not pressed.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-143
Satish Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
