Accused sought bail but counsel did not press the application, seeking liberty to reapply after recording of two witnesses' statements. The Court dismissed the application as not pressed and directed that those statements be recorded on a priority basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3648/2024
Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Poluram, Aged 33 Years, R/o Village Hanutiya, Tehsil Bijaynager, District Beawar (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Beawar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. N.S. Gurjar, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
09/04/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the bail application and seeks liberty to file afresh after recording of the statements of Manoj Rathi and Smt. Prakashi Devi.
The instant bail application is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty aforesaid.
It is directed that statement of Manoj Rathi and Smt. Prakashi Devi be recorded on the priority basis.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
ashu /158
Mukesh Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
