Lumba Ram v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's counsel submitted that the bail application had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The Court dismissed the application on this basis.
The petitioner's counsel submitted that the bail application had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The Court dismissed the application on this basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1) [CRLMB-2457/2024]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2457/2024
Lumba Ram son of Veera Ram aged about 34 years resident of Bagli, Police Station Jhab, District Sanchore (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
| ----Respondent | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Kuldeep Sharma Mr. Darshan Ram |
|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gaurav Singh-PP |
THROUGH VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
08/04/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efÒux of time the criminal miscellaneous bail application itself has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant criminal miscellaneous bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
57-Rahul Joshi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application has become infructuous due to expiry of time?
Lumba Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court