Allowed

Jaipal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Mar 2024CRLMB/3461/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment concerns a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, a juvenile in judicial custody, sought bail in an NDPS case involving contraband below commercial quantity. The court considered the totality of circumstances and deemed it just and proper to grant bail subject to a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each.

Jaipal Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:13826]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3461/2024

¶4

Jaipal S/o Late Shri Mukhram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No.4, Dabli Khurd, Tehsil Tibbi, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Hanumangarh)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. BhoopSingh for Mr. Anjani Chotia
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Anita Gehlot, PP assisted by
	Ms. Kamla Goswami

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Order

¶11

22/03/2024

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.189/2022, Police Station Tibbi, District Hanumangarh registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/18 and 29 of the NDPS Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that challan of the case has been presented and the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 10.01.2024 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the accusedpetitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer of bail.

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:13826]

[CRLMB-3461/2024]

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

¶19

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Jaipal S/o Late Shri Mukhram shall be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. No.189/2022, Police Station Tibbi, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶22

126-Rashi/-

Jaipal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaipal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivraj Singh @ Tillu Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav @ Gauri Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhishek @ Monti Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishori S Vs State of Rajasthan

Ratnaram Vs State of Rajasthan