Allowed

Rakesh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Mar 2024CRLMB/2967/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by Rakesh in an IPC case involving offences under Sections 384, 366, 392, 376-D, 120-B, 411 and 414. The court deemed it just and proper to release the petitioner on a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail in FIR No. 52/2022 upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Rakesh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:13840]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2967/2024

¶4

Rakesh S/o Hema Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Naya Gaon, Alay, Police Station Shree Balaji, Dist. Nagaur. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Nagaur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. M.L. Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP assisted by
	Ms. Kamla Goswami

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Order

¶11

22/03/2024

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.52/2022 registered at Mahila Thana, District Nagaur for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 366, 392, 376-D, 120-B, 411 & 414 of the IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prosecutrix has been examined as PW.2 before the trial Court and there are material contradictions, improvements and omissions in her statement. Similarly situated co-accused Anna Ram @ Anop has already been granted bail by this Court and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long

[2024:RJ-JD:13840]

[CRLMB-2967/2024]

(2 of 2)

time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

¶19

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Rakesh S/o Hema Ram shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.52/2022 registered at Mahila Thana, District Nagaur provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial/link court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶22

117-Rashi/-

Rakesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivraj Singh @ Tillu Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav @ Gauri Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhishek @ Monti Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishori S Vs State of Rajasthan

Ratnaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaipal Vs State of Rajasthan