Allowed

Ratnaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Mar 2024CRLMB/3362/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case under Sections 8/15 and 29, noting the contraband was below commercial quantity and the co-accused had already been bailed. The court considered the accused's long detention in judicial custody.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Ratnaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:14001]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3362/2024

¶4

Ratnaram S/o Sh. Hadmanaram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gajsukhdesar, Teh Nokha, Dist Bikaner. (Lodged In Sub Jail Nohar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Suresh Nehra
For Respondent(s)	: Dr. Arun Kumar,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

22/03/2024

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.158/2023 of Police Station Pallu, District Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15 & 29 of the NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. Coaccused Mani Ram has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 03.08.2023. The accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long and the trial of the case will take time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

[2024:RJ-JD:14001]

[CRLMB-3362/2024]

(2 of 2)

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ratnaram S/o Shri Hadmanaram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.158/2023 of Police Station Pallu, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶22

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶23

11-nidhi/-

Ratnaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratnaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivraj Singh @ Tillu Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav @ Gauri Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhishek @ Monti Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishori S Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaipal Vs State of Rajasthan