Allowed

Rahul Singh S/O Devendra v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Sept 2024CRLMB/10786/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a second bail application filed by an accused arrested for offences under IPC Sections 323, 341, 506 and 34. The Court granted bail noting no allegation of grievous hurt and directed the petitioner to furnish a personal bond and provide two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail subject to personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Rahul Singh S/O Devendra Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:38303]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No. 10786/2024

¶4

Rahul Singh S/o Devendra, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Akbarpur, Police Station Shrimahaveerji, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City, Karauli).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, PP Mr. Ravindra Mavliya & Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, for complainant

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶11

Order

¶12

10/09/2024

¶13

This second bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 016/2024 registered at Police Station Mahaveer Ji, District Karauli for offence u/S 323, 341, 506 & 34 of IPC. Later on charge-sheet was filed u/S 341, 323, 326, 506 & 34 of IPC.

¶14

The first bail application No. 9209/2024, filed by the accused-petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 30.07.2024, with liberty to file fresh after filing of charge-sheet.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He further submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2024. He also submits that in the statements of the witness so also the injured witness, there is no allegation

[2024:RJ-JP:38303]

[CRLMB-10786/2024]

(2 of 2)

against the accused petitioner of causing any grievous hurt. He also submits that the incident took place all of a sudden during a cricket game.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that there are specific allegations against the accused petitioner of causing injuries to the injured Parikshit.

¶21

Having considered the allegations levelled against the accused petitioner so also the fact that no grievous injury has been attributed to the accused petitioner and the charge-sheet has already been field by the police, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/(Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶24

GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /24

Rahul Singh S/O Devendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Singh S/O Devendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Viswajit Roy S/O Shri Shikanto Roy Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Yadav @ Karan S/O Chunnu Lal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Rasid S/O Rahamdin Vs State of Rajasthan

Vasim S/O Aamin Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu Kumar Parihar S/O Shri Kanhaiyalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pk @ P S/O Purshottam Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan