Allowed

Rasid S/O Rahamdin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Sept 2024CRLMB/7884/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail applications for online fraud offences under IPC Sections 419/420/467/468/471/384/120-B and IT Act Sections 66-D/66-E were allowed as chargesheet had been filed and no other cases pending. Petitioners released on furnishing personal bond with sureties, barred from celebrating release in public.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing Rs.1,00,000/- personal bond each with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each; prohibited from public celebration of release.

Rasid S/O Rahamdin Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:38107]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7884/2024

¶4

Rasid S/o Rahamdin, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Mungska Police Station Pahadi District Deeg. At Present In Sub Jail, Deeg.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, through the PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7909/2024

¶11

Ezaz S/o Hazar Khan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Kharbad, Police Station Pahari, Distt. Deeg (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).

¶12

Aamin S/o Hazar Khan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Kharbad, Police Station Pahari, Distt. Deeg (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).

¶13

----Petitioners

¶14

Versus

¶15

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶16

----Respondent

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Mr. Shivam Mr. Hemendra Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, Public Prosecutor

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶19

Order

¶20

09/09/2024

¶21

Both the bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.201/2024 registered at Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg for offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 384 & 120-B of IPC and under Sections 66-D & 66-E of the Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008.

[2024:RJ-JP:38107]

[CRLMB-7884/2024]

(2 of 3)

Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody since 07.06.2024. Counsels further submit that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted chargesheet in the matter and the petitioners are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Counsels further submit that no other criminal cases are pending against the petitioners, therefore, they may be released on bail.

¶26

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail applications.

¶27

Considered the submissions made by learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

¶28

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsels for the petitioners so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and also the fact that no other criminal cases are pending against the petitioners, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶29

Accordingly, both the bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to

(3 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JP:38107]

[CRLMB-7884/2024]

which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶34

It has been brought to the notice of this Court that these accused-persons of particular areas, who are involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, will celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is imposed that the petitioners shall not celebrate their release in public and if they are found to be involved in celebrating their release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of their bail.

¶35

The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in the connected case file.

¶36

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶37

Satyendra/70-71

Rasid S/O Rahamdin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rasid S/O Rahamdin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ayush S/O Subhash Chandra Vs State of Rajasthan

Sameer Qureshi S/O Rahimuddin Vs State of Rajasthan

Hariom S/O Kedar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shaitan Gurjar S/O Shri Mewaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikash @ Dholiya S/O Dhayanad Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh Kumar Yadav S/O Shravanlal Vs State of Rajasthan