The High Court Bench at Jaipur dismissed Bail Application No. 10383/2024 as infructuous because the petitioner had already been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:52223]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10383/2024
Vinod S/o Battilal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gram Koyla, Police Station Bamanwas, District Gangapur City.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh Choudhary, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
19/12/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has already been arrested, the instant bail application has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
SAURABH /481
Vinod S/o Battilal
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
