The court dismissed the petition for pre-arrest bail filed under Section 482 B.N.S.S., finding that the petitioner had been absconding for a long time and a warrant had been issued against him. The court held that exceptional circumstances warranting pre-arrest bail were not present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:52221]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10310/2024
Ravindra S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Panwad Thana, Tehsil Bawal District Rewari Haryana.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Ajay Yadav |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | Ganesh Dutt Dautam | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Devi Singh Choudhary, P.P. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
19/12/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:52221]
[CRLMB-10310/2024]
(2 of 2)
for a long time & a warrant has been issued against the petitioner under Section 37 of the Rajasthan Police Act. The name of the petitioner has also been mentioned in the F.I.R. It has come in the evidence of injured, namely Krishan that the petitioner had caused injuries to him.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
SAURABH /480
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-petitioner is entitled to pre-arrest bail in the present FIR?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravindra S/o Vijay Singh
State Of Rajasthan
VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
