This short order dismisses an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. where the Court declined to grant relief due to the nature of allegations and the pendency of seven other criminal cases against the petitioner.
The anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:36908]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10325/2024 Faeem Khan S/o Shri Abdul Farid, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 2728 Akbar Colony, Kunda Delhi Marg Amber, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order
03/09/2024
[CRLMB-10325/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:36908]
(2 of 2)
bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Satyendra/28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Petitioner shall be granted anticipatory bail under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil NaduReferred¶12
Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2013 SC 2306 · Who else cites this
Faeem Khan
State of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
