Four accused sought bail in FIR for offences under BNS 2023. Court found no specific overt act assigned to any petitioner in the FIR or injured witnesses' statements, and enlarged all four on bail on personal bonds with sureties.
Accused-petitioners enlarged on bail; personal bond Rs.1,00,000 each with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:37874]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
Connected With
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.R. Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, Public Prosecutor Mr. Gajender Singh Rathore & Mr. Dinesh Chandra Sharma for complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
06/09/2024
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of
[CRLMB-10134/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:37874]
(2 of 3)
accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.215/2024 registered at Police Station Manpur, District Dausa for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 109(1), 324(4) and 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:37874]
[CRLMB-10134/2024]
any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Ashish Kumar /388-389
1 issue framed by the court
Whether accused with no specific overt act assigned in FIR or injured witnesses' statements should be enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS.
8 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramkhiladi
Ramesh
Lallu
Kamlesh
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
