Two writ petitions were dispensed with and dismissed as having become infructuous based on the petitioners' counsel's submission. Consequently, all stay applications and pending applications in these petitions were also dismissed.
Stay applications and pending applications stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:38169]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 67/2023
Manju Devi D/o Shri Balvir, W/o Shri Satya Narayan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Post Digharla, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 974/2023
Kavita Rathore D/o Shri Ashok Kumar Rathore, W/o Shri Amit Rathore, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Mohbari Gate, Tehsil Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
[2023:RJ-JP:38169]
[CW-67/2023]
(2 of 2)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order
06/12/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these petitions have become infructuous.
In view of statement made by counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Since, both the petitions have been dismissed, stay applications and pending application/s, if any, also stand dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Satyendra/141-142
Manju Devi
Kavita Rathore
The State Of Rajasthan
GANESH RAM MEENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
