Disposed

Ekta Bagaria D/O Shri Mool Chand Bagaria v. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

Rajasthan HC6 Dec 2023CW/11188/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions contesting the selection process. Relying on Karishma, the court directed respondents to refer objectionable questions to an expert body for re-examination within six weeks (modified from ten days for representation submission) post-receipt of representations, ensuring appointment chances for successful candidates.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed directing respondents to refer objectionable questions to expert body within six weeks after receiving representations within ten days.

Ekta Bagaria D/O Shri Mool Chand Bagaria Vs… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:38263]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11188/2023

¶4

Ekta Bagaria D/o Shri Mool Chand Bagaria, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Subodh School, Kishan Colony, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶8

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶9

And other similar matters as per Schedule appended

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Ms. Anita Saini Mr. Giriraj Rajoria Mr. Aamir Khan Mr. Gopesh Kumar
		Mr. Sandeep Kalwania
		Ms. Komal Kumari Giri
		Mr. Bajrang Sepat
		Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma Mr. Lucky Sharma
		Mr. Mahipal Singh Kharra Mr. Dharmendra Fageriya Mr. Vigyan Shah
		Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank
		Ms. Almas Khanam Ms. Neha Godara
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Nalin G. Narain Mr. C.L. Saini, AAG Mr. Narendra Singh Choudhary

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

06/12/2023

¶14

Since the controversy involved in all these petitions (schedule appended) is identical, hence, same are being decided by this common order.

[2023:RJ-JP:38263]

[CW-11188/2023]

(2 of 7)

Learned counsels appearing for the parties fairly submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court vide order dated 28.11.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18767/2023 “Karishma & Ors. Vs. The Director of Primary Education, Bikaner & Ors.” alongwith other connected matters.

¶19

In case of Karishma (supra) this Court has observed as under:-

¶20

“8. In case of Raman Choudhary (supra) the Coordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur has observed as under:-

¶21

“In view of the discussions made above, the present writ petitions are disposed of with a directions to the respondents to refer the questions mentioned in these writ petitions to the experts appointed by them (other than those who had already finalized the objections to the preliminary answer key dated 18.03.2023). The expert body, while re-examining the matter, shall take into account the submissions made in the present writ petitions and thereafter pass appropriate orders with respect to the adjudication made by them on the objectionable questions raised in these writ petitions. The said exercise of examination by the expert body shall be completed within a period of four weeks from today and if the respondents find the report of the expert committee giving any change to the answers adjudicated by them in the final answer key, they will take the appropriate measures for revising the result.

¶22

Needless to say, if the petitioners come in the merit after revision of the result, appropriate action will be taken for processing their case for appointment.

¶23

It is also made clear that question Nos.3, 27 & 50 of the Master Question Paper need not be sent to the expert body for re-examination.”

¶24

In view of the above, this Court disposes off these writ petitions with liberty to the petitioners to submit the representation detailing out their specific objections as has been

(3 of 7)

[2023:RJ-JP:38263]

[CW-11188/2023]

stated in the writ petitions, to the respondents within fifteen days from today. The respondents on receipt of the representation, shall refer the questions mentioned in the representation to the experts appointed by them (other than those who had already finalized the objections to the preliminary answer key dated 18.03.2023). The Expert Body, while re-examining the matter, shall take into account the averments made in the representation and thereafter, pass appropriate order in respect to the adjudication made by them on the objectionable questions raised in these writ petitions and submit before the respondents by filing the representation. The said exercise of examination by the Expert Body shall be completed within a period of six weeks from today and if the respondents find the report of the Expert Committee giving any change to the answers adjudicated by them in the final answer key, they will take the appropriate measures for revising the result.

¶29

Needless to say, if the petitioners come in the merit after revision of the result, appropriate action will be taken for processing their case for appointment.

¶30

It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the RSSB has already made recommendation to the State Government for giving appointment to the selected candidates on the post of Teacher Grade-III Level-II in various subjects. The respondentState shall make a mention in the appointment orders to be issued about the order of re-examination of the answer key and in case the result is revised and any person who has also been given appointment prior to the revision of the result, does not find place in the revised merit list, the appointment given to him before revised result will not create any right in his favour to continue.”

¶31

Considering the submissions made by counsels for the parties, these writ petitions are disposed off in terms & conditions as given in case of Karishma (supra) with a modification that the petitioners may submit their representations within ten days from today.

¶32

Since the main petitions have been disposed off, the stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶33

Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in the connected case files.

¶34

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶35

SHARMA NK DY.REGISTRAR/796-821

(4 of 7)

[2023:RJ-JP:38263]

[CW-11188/2023]

SCHEDULE

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9301/2023

Kavita Yadav

----Petitioner

Versus

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

¶45

----Respondent

¶46

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9331/2023

¶47

Jagdeesh Prasad Gurjar

¶48

----Petitioner

¶49

Versus

¶50

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

¶51

----Respondent ----Petitioner ----Respondent ----Petitioner ----Respondent

¶52

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9387/2023

¶53

Ajay Verma

¶54

Versus

¶55

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

¶56

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9442/2023

¶57

Neha Singhal

¶58

Versus

¶59

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

¶60

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9444/2023

Raju Kumawat

----Petitioner

Versus

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

¶65

----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9491/2023 Jyoti Samria ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9561/2023 Pooja

----Petitioner

(5 of 7)

[2023:RJ-JP:38263]

[CW-11188/2023]

Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board S.B. Civil Writ Petition	----Respondent No. 9562/2023
Sunil Kumar Versus	----Petitioner
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, S.B. Civil Writ Petition	----Respondent No. 9580/2023
Sher Singh Versus	----Petitioner
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board S.B. Civil Writ Petition	----Respondent No. 9675/2023
Bhawana Patidar Versus	----Petitioner
State Of Rajasthan S.B. Civil Writ Petition	----Respondent No. 9704/2023
Sachin Kumar Sharma Versus	----Petitioner
State Of Rajasthan	----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition	No. 10018/2023
Gomati	----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board S.B. Civil Writ Petition	----Respondent No. 10172/2023
Soniya Sharma Versus	----Petitioner
State Of Rajasthan	----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition	No. 10222/2023

[2023:RJ-JP:38263]

[CW-11188/2023]

(6 of 7)

Abhishek Meena

----Petitioner

Versus

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

¶78

----Respondent

¶79

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10226/2023

Kanchan Saini

----Petitioner

Versus

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

¶84

----Respondent

¶85

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10267/2023

Sanju Kanwar

----Petitioner

Versus

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

¶90

----Respondent

¶91

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10269/2023

¶92

Shuchi Jain

¶93

----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10299/2023 Kundan Meena ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10318/2023 Deepika ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10513/2023 Surendra Singh ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

¶94

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

Kundan Meena

(7 of 7)

[2023:RJ-JP:38263]

[CW-11188/2023]

----Respondent

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10616/2023 Sunita Khokhar ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10895/2023 Lokesh Meena ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10897/2023 Utkal Ranjan Sahu ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11262/2023 Rahul Kumar ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11339/2023 Priyanka Kumari ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board ----Respondent

Ekta Bagaria D/O Shri Mool Chand Bagaria v. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ekta Bagaria D/O Shri Mool Chand Bagaria v. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Shankar Pareek S/O Durga Lal Pareek Vs the State of Rajasthan

Khemraj Sehriya S/O Ghanshyam Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Sharma Son of Shri Bhagwati Prasad Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Geeta D/O Lal Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Jashoda Dodiyar D/O Roopal Ji Dodiyar Vs Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

Seema Sharma D/O Mahendra Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan