This order records legal representatives of the deceased petitioner and dismisses the writ petition as infructuous, vacating the earlier stay order.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; the stay order is vacated; legal representatives are recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9202/2009
LRs of deceased petitioner late Peetha Ram:-
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Khatri
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
12/04/2023
The matter comes up for orders on the interlocutory application (No.02/2023) for taking legal representatives of the petitioner on record.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is disposed of and the legal representatives of the petitioner are taken on record. Amended cause title has already been filed. The same is also taken on record.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
(2 of 2) [CW-9202/2009]
Accordingly, the same is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Stay application is also dismissed.
Needless to say, that the stay order granted by this Court on 18.09.2009 which was confirmed on 15.04.2014, stands vacated.
(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
18-/Devesh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the death of the original petitioner and subsequent claims for legal heirs.
Whether the stay order previously granted in the matter stands vacated.
Girdhari Lal
Bhanwra Ram
Smt. Deoo
State of Rajasthan
Sub-Divisional Officer, Sujangarh
Additional Tehsildar, Bidasar
Dr. Justice Nupur Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
