The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous since the Income Tax Department released the refund to the petitioner after rectifying its order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:42871-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8796/2014
Santosh Vishnoi
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer Jodhpur And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Bhandari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Order
08/12/2023
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the refund of the petitioner, was withheld by the Income Tax Department regarding calculation of interest, in view of the fact that demand was pending against the petitioner, however later on, the respondent-Income Tax Department has rectified the order and released the refund in favour of the petitioner as per her claim vide Annexure-R/1 annexed with the reply to the writ petition.
No counter reply has been filed on behalf of the petitioner Hence, in view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law, if occasion so arises.
(MUNNURI LAXMAN),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
77-Arun/-
Santosh Vishnoi
Income Tax Officer Jodhpur
Vijay Bishnoi
Munnuri Laxman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
