In a writ petition where petitioners contended that a reference was dismissed during pendency, the High Court dismissed the petition as having become infructuous due to the subsequent development.
dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous due to dismissal of the original reference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/004669]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 774/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
Kailash Choudhary S/o Shri Kanaram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Ramsinghpura @ Rampura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
22/03/2023
Counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the present writ petition, the original reference No.328/2022 has been dismissed by the learned Jaipur Development Authority Appellate Tribunal and in view of the subsequent development, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands dismissed, as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /56
Jaipur Development Authority, Through Secretary
Deputy Commissioner, Zone-08, Jaipur Development Authority
Kailash Choudhary
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
