Allowed

Vikram Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Feb 2023CW/710/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of the writ petition on the submission that it was covered by precedents. It directed the Tehsildar to decide the pending notice and reply within eight weeks. A stay against dispossession of the land was granted pending the decision.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Tehsildar to decide the pending notice and reply within eight weeks without dispossession of the subject land.

Vikram Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan — Land Acquisition | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/003481]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 710/2023

¶4

Vikram Singh S/o Shri Dalla Singh Rawat, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Near Kalka Mataji Temple, Village Balaton Ki Guwar, Tehsil Bhim, District Rajsamand.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Rajasthan, through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The District Collector, Rajsamand.

¶9

The Sub Divisional Officer, Bhim, District Rajsamand.

¶10

The Tehsildar, Bhim, District Rajsamand.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Choudhary

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

02/02/2023

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court rendered in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10736/2022 “Jannu Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” and other connected matters decided on 25.08.2022. He further submits that this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17416/2022 “Pratap Das Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” has also passed the similar order on 18.11.2022.

¶18

In view of the submissions made before this Court, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4-Tehsildar, Bhim, District Rajsamand to decide the

(2 of 2)

[2023/RJJD/003481]

[CW-710/2023]

pending notice dated 14.01.2022 and the reply to the same filed by the petitioner in accordance with law. The respondent No.4 shall decide the same within a period of eight weeks from today and till the respondent No.4 decides the matter under Notice dated 14.01.2022, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the subject piece of land.

¶23

Stay petition also stands disposed of.

¶24

The present writ petition is disposed of on the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and if the authorities find that the matter is not squarely covered by the judgments rendered in the case of Jannu Khan and Pratap Das (supra) , they will be free to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶25

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶26

139-Shahenshah/-

Vikram Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pulak Mukharjee Vs the Registrar of Trade Marks

Pulak Mukharjee Vs the Registrar of Trade Marks

Pulak Mukharjee Vs the Registrar of Trade Marks (Govt. of India)

Khinv Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jeet Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rajeev Gandhi Livestock Assistant Training Center Vs State of Rajasthan