The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order against the petitioner, a driver. It held that interference is improper absent mala fides or flagrant violation of policy, citing Union of India Vs. Deepak Niranjan Nath Pandit.
Petition dismissed; impugned transfer order affirmed; stay application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/009367]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6802/2023
Tara Singh S/o Shri Jugal Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Vpo Barouli Chhar, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
04/05/2023
(2 of 2)
[2023/RJJP/009367]
[CW-6802/2023]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SACHIN/13
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the transfer order of the petitioner driver from District Pool Bharatpur to District Pool Sawai Madhopur.
Whether the transfer order was passed mala fide or in flagrant violation of transfer policy.
Whether the challenge to the Tribunal's order affirming the transfer order succeeds under Article 227.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India Vs. Deepak Niranjan Nath PanditFollowed¶23
Union of India Vs. Deepak Niranjan Nath Pandit [(2020) 3 SCC 404] · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Tara Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Shiv Kumar
Sudesb Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
