The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the petition had become so due to the efflux of time. No substantive hearing or legal proposition was elaborated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:34879]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6388/2012
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
17/11/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /188
Pratibha Singh Ratnu
Shailesh Kumar
Rajasthan State Sports Council
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
