The single-judge Bench dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous due to the efflux of time. No detailed reasoning or substantive law was provided in this one-line order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:34876]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3705/2013
Ram Chandra Dhenwal, son of Shri Kishan Lal, aged about 52 years, resident of C-3/82, Chitrakoot, near Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.L. Avasthi, Addl.G.c. Mr. K.S. Chandel
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
17/11/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands dismissed, as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra/26
Ram Chandra Dhenwal
State of Rajasthan
Union of India
Union Public Service Commission
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
