The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Counsel submitted that the petition has become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:34655]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6612/2005
Chhotu Lal Sisodia, s/o Shri Kalyan Singh Sisodia, aged 49 years, r/o 1/34 Shahu Nagar, Sawai-Madhopur at present Forest Guard, Dy. Forest Conservator and Dy. Director Core, Tiger Project Ranthambhore, Sawai-Madhopur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Rohit Tiwari |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. N.K. Bhatta,AGC |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
16/11/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
JYOTI /263
Chhotu Lal Sisodia
State Of Rajasthan
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
