Petitioners argued the writ petition was infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and automatically dismissed pending applications.
None; petition dismissed as infructuous and pending applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:37793]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3470/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.A. Naqvi, AAG (Sr. Adv.) with Mr. S.A. Naqvi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
05/12/2023
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
[2023:RJ-JP:37793]
[CW-3470/2020]
(2 of 2)
In view of the statements made by counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Since the main petition has been dismissed, all other pending application/s, if any, also stands dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
DIVYA SAINI /18
Mukesh Kumar Aoud
Khalil Mohammad
Rehana Banu Ansari
Shobha Lal Dhaker
Sanjay Kumar Dhaker
State Of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
Divya Saini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
