This order notes that counsel for petitioners stated the writ petition is infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition on this ground. No stay or other pending applications were allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:37592]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1754/2023
----Petitioners
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order
04/12/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition has become infructuous.
[2023:RJ-JP:37592]
[CW-1754/2023]
(2 of 2)
In view of statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Since, the main petition is dismissed, stay application and pending application/s, if any, also stand dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Satyendra/78
Usha Bai D/o Ramkishan, Ajay Kumar Meena, Komal Khinchi, Dipika Sethiya, Vikas Kumar Pannu
State Of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
