Disposed

Pushpa Bhatt v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 May 2023CW/3031/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking direction to post her at a nearby place where the Principal post was vacant. The court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation with the competent authority, detailing vacant Principal posts.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation regarding vacant Principal posts within two weeks, with the authority to decide within six weeks.

Pushpa Bhatt Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/014196]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3031/2023

¶4

Pushpa Bhatt D/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Regar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o.1/161, Housing Board, Saket Nagar, Beawar, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. (Transferred From Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Lagetkhera, Rajsamand To Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Bali Jasskhera, Rajsamand).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶9

The Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Lagetkhera, Block Bhim, District Rajsamand.

¶10

Suwa Lal Sinwasia, Principal At Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Bali Jasskhera, Rajsamand.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) :

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

09/05/2023

¶16

The petitioner contends that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the respondents to consider her representation to post him at a nearby place, in accordance with law, where post of Principal is lying vacant.

¶17

The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to address a fresh representation before the competent authority pointing out vacant posts of Principal

(2 of 2)

[2023/RJJD/014196]

[CW-3031/2023]

within a period of two weeks along with photostat copy of the earlier representation and certified copy of the order instant.

¶22

In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt thereof.

¶23

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶24

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶25

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶26

37-SanjayS/-

Pushpa Bhatt v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpa Bhatt v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhay Kumar Dhamaniya Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dr. Bheraram Jany Vs State of Rajasthan

Harpal Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Smt. Pooja Chhipa Vs State of Rajasthan

Hanumana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Meenu Saini Vs the State of Rajasthan