This court disposed of a writ petition involving teachers employed as G-Iii Level-2, relying on an order dated 02.02.2023 passed by a coordinate bench in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.981/2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/015112]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2694/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Bishnoi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Chandak for Mr. Pankaj Sharma, AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order
15/05/2023
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by
(2 of 2)
[2023/RJJD/015112]
[CW-2694/2023]
judgment dated 02.02.2023 passed by a coordinate bench of this court in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.981/2022 (Chet Ram V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors.) .
The counsel for the respondents submits that he is not in a position to dispute the submission made by the counsel for the petitioners.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 02.02.2023 in the case of Chet Ram (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
37-AnilSingh/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Chet Ram V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors.Distinguished¶22
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.981/2022 (Chet Ram V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors.)
Jaimala Gupta D/o Prem Chand
Komal Bajiya D/o Jhabar Singh Bajiya
State Of Rajasthan
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
