This judgment makes an interim order absolute and allows the respondents to pass a fresh transfer order. It also directs the State to pay unadvised TA and DA by 20.05.2023.
Interim order made absolute; liberty to pass fresh transfer order; liberty to challenge fresh orders; State to pay TA & DA by 20.05.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/015103]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1861/2023
Sumitra Badarda W/o Shri Jetha Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o- House No. 3 Kesaw Kunj, Laxmi Nagar, Hanuman Bag, Nagaur.
----Petitioner
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
15/05/2023
(2 of 2)
[2023/RJJD/015103]
[CW-1861/2023]
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
35-AnilSingh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim order in the writ petition should be made absolute against the respondents.
Whether the State is liable to pay Travel Allowance (TA) & Dearness Allowance (DA) to the petitioner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Praveen Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶1
Praveen Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12829/2022
Sumitra Badarda W/o Shri Jetha Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
