The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within three months, considering a prior order in Daulat Ram.
Direction to respondents to consider and decide petitioner's representation within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:43898]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19282/2023
Liyakat Ali S/o Shri Khurshid Mohd., Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of Behind House, Street No. 2, Ward No. 33, Nohar, District Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sonika Poonia for Mr. D.S. Thind.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
15/12/2023
[2023:RJ-JD:43898]
[CW-19282/2023]
(2 of 2)
representation of the petitioner, while keeping into consideration the order passed in Daulat Ram (supra) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law. All pending applications also stand disposed of.
(PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
343-Zeeshan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the petition by directing respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation in light of a prior order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Daulat Ram v. Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors.Referred¶16
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015.
Liyakat Ali S/o Shri Khurshid Mohd.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
