Disposed

Mamta Sankhi v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Oct 2023CW/12088/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, at the direction of the learned counsel for the petitioner, disposed of the writ petition. The court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the competent authority within two weeks, pointing out vacant posts and attaching copies of the earlier representation and the instant order, to ensure expeditious redressal of the grievance. The stay applicati

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file fresh representation with copies within two weeks.

Mamta Sankhi Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:33455]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12088/2023

¶4

Mamta Sankhi W/o Dr. Desh Bandhu Tiwari, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Mataji Nagar, Sojat Road, District Pali (Rajasthan)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶8

Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Rajasthan).

¶9

District Education Officer, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶10

Chief Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Sammitee, Luni District Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Singh Godara

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

07/10/2023

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the respondents to consider petitioner’s representation to be posted at a nearby place, in accordance with law, where concerned post is lying vacant.

¶17

The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to address a fresh representation before the competent authority pointing out vacant posts within a period of two weeks alongwith photostat copy of the earlier representation and certified copy of the order instant.

¶18

In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with

[2023:RJ-JD:33455]

[CW-12088/2023]

(2 of 2)

law, preferably within a period of two weeks from the receipt thereof.

¶23

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶24

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶25

The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief..

¶26

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶27

14-Vivek/-

Mamta Sankhi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamta Sankhi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Budh Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Tejpal Saini Vs the State of Rajasthan

Raju Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Sanju Vs State of Rajasthan

Prakash Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Babu Lal Kadela Vs State of Rajasthan