Murlidhar Sharma v. Shri Purushottam Sharma and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the hearing date despite multiple previous notices.
The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the hearing date despite multiple previous notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 748/2017
Murlidhar Sharma S/o Late Shri Hanuman Prasad Ji Sharma, R/o House No.19/335 Laxminath Mandir Ki Gali Daulatbagh Roadganj, Ajmer (At Present R/o Opposite Rai Bhawan, Shashtri Nagar Road, Ajmer, Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None Present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
19/01/2023
Today, none has appeared on behalf of the appellant even in second round. On last two occasions also dated 07.07.2020 and 03.02.2021, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant.
Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Satyendra/45
Murlidhar Sharma
Purushottam Sharma
Municipal Corporation, Ajmer
CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court