High Court allowed a criminal misc. petition to quash an FIR and subsequent proceedings on the ground that a compromise was arrived at between the petitioners and the complainant, relying on the ratio of a Supreme Court decision.
FIR No. 284/2022 and entire proceedings pursuant thereto were quashed. A stay petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 8567/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Arun Kumar,PP |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
10/01/2023
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-8567/2022]
furnished by the learned Public Prosecutor. The said factual report is taken on record.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
24-nirmala/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether FIR and entire proceedings can be quashed upon a compromise between parties invoking inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Whether the ratio of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. is applicable to the present case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr.Relied on¶15
Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303] · Who else cites this
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Relied on¶20
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (supra)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajkumar Khatik
Surendra Khatik
Dharmendra
State Of Rajasthan
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
