Dismissed
Garvit Innovative Promoters Limited (G.I.P.L.) v. Umesh Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Hari Shankar
Rajasthan HCCRLMP/194/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner company filed a S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous petition challenging the framing of charges under s. 138 NI Act. The court dismissed the petition because the director challenging the charge was not a petitioner in his individual capacity. However, the court directed that the company propose another representative or the accused Karanpal Singh will represent the company.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as devoid of merit; direction to consider feasibility of new representative if proposed, otherwise accused No.2 to represent company.