The Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application as not maintainable. Observing that the petitioners were already on bail, it held there was no apprehension of arrest and invited them to appear as directed once the charge sheet was submitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1496/2023
All R/o Village Dhimri Ka Pura, Police Station Sadar, District Dholpur
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Sudhir Jain |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, PP Mr. Brijedra Singh Kachawa for |
| Mr. Yogesh Singhal | |
| Mr. Krishan Kumar, SI PS- Sadar, Dholpur |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
Order
10/10/2023
[CRLMB-1496/2023]
(2 of 2)
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J
ashu /184
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application is maintainable when the applicants are already on bail.
Whether a change in the charge sheet substituting Section 326 IPC for Section 325 IPC warrants fresh anticipatory bail.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Sohil S/o Shri Sahiram, Gaurav S/o Shri Vijay @ Billu, Rohit S/o Shri Aakash
State Of Rajasthan
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
