Bail application dismissed due to petitioner's counsel absence on multiple dates. No substantive law discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9117/2022
Naveen Singla
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Vikram Sharma, P.P. |
| Mr. D.S. Gharsana, for the | |
| complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
11/05/2023
On 15.12.2022, 03.01.2023, 06.02.2023, 17.04.2023 and 26.04.2023, counsel for the petitioner was absent, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
263-Taruna/-
Naveen Singla
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
