Petitioner sought liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording of prosecutrix statement. Bail application was dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/013516]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 628/2023 Deda Ram S/o Sh. Panna Ram, Aged About 41 Years, B/c Jat, R/ o Midia-Tala (Dudhiya-Kalan), P.s. Dhorimanna, Dist. Barmer (Raj.). (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Barmer).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. PradeepKumar Shah |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mhod. Anis Bhurat, PP |
| Mr. R.J. Punia,for the complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
04/05/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present bail application at this stage and seeks liberty to file a fresh bail application after statement of prosecutrix is recorded. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
It is expected that the trial Court will record the statement of prosecutrix on priority basis.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
20-KshamaD/-
DEDA RAM
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
KULDEEP MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
