Allowed

Rahul v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 May 2023CRLMB/637/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan allowed the petitioner's plea for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., directing his release on personal bond and sureties pending completion of trial for theft and criminal breach of trust.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Rahul Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/013238]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 637/2023

¶4

Rahul S/o Rajesh Jeengar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Mochi Mohalla Nimbaheda Thana Nimbaheda Sadar District Chittorgarh. (At Present Lodged At Sub Jail Gulabpura, Bhilwara)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Jitendra Ojha.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shrawan Kumar,P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

03/05/2023

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the materials available on record.

¶14

This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.227/2022, registered at Police Station Rayla, District Bhilwara, for offences under Sections 379 & 411 of the IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. Challan of the case has already been filed. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

[2023/RJJD/013238]

[CRLMB-637/2023]

(2 of 2)

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rahul S/o Rajesh Jeengar arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.227/2022, registered at Police Station Rayla, District Bhilwara, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

¶22

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J

¶23

97-Prashant/-

Rahul v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh @ Kallu Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Sukhwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohd. Hussain Shah @ Hussain Katora Vs State of Rajasthan

Hapu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Irfan Multani Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan