Allowed

Rohitash v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 May 2023CRLMB/5141/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the court granted bail to the petitioner accused in an NDPS case, noting the quantity of contraband was below commercial limits and the trial would take long.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Rohitash Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/013614]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5141/2023

¶4

Rohitash S/o Dharmveer, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Gali No. 18, Rampura Basti, Lalgarh, Baglanagar, Bikaner, Tehsil And District Bikaner (Raj.) (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Hanumangarh)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

04/05/2023

¶13

This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.85/2023 registered at Police Station Goluwala, District Hanumangarh, for offences under Sections 8/15 and 25 of the NDPS Act.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶16

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

[2023/RJJD/013614]

¶18

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-5141/2023]

¶19

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶20

Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rohitash S/o Dharmveer arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.85/2023 registered at Police Station Goluwala, District Hanumangarh, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

¶21

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J

¶22

146-Tikam/-

Rohitash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohitash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kesar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mani Bharduwaj Vs State of Rajasthan

Rameshwar @ Rakesh Vs State of Rajasthan