Hon'ble Justice Narendra Singh Dhaddha dismissed the petitioner's anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. held that being a habitual offender with pending cases and need for custodial interrogation made it a non-fit case for bail.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; no bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 622/2023
Arun Agarwal Son Of Shri Biajnath Agarwal, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Sector-2, Shashtri Nagar, Behind Agra Bus Stand, P.s. Nihalganj, Dholpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naman Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
24/03/2023
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-622/2023]
petitioner is required for recovery of money. Hence, his bail be dismissed.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Seema/37
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Whether the petitioner being a habitual offender with pending cases warrants rejection of anticipatory bail
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arun Agarwal
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
