Allowed

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 May 2023CRLMB/4904/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the second bail application of the petitioner in an IPC cheating and wrongful confinement case. Considering the delay in trial and lack of merit expression, the court granted bail subject to the petitioner executing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner Anil Kumar ordered released on bail upon execution of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Anil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4904/2023

¶3

Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Daya Ram, Aged About 25 Years, Jhalamand, Jodhpur, Raj. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Shyam Sunder Paliwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mukhtiar Khan,PP

¶9

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI Order

¶10

09/05/2023

¶11

This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.31/2023 registered on 17.01.2023 at Police Station Kudi Bhagtasni, District Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 395 and 341 of IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that first bail application of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 21.03.2023 however, liberty was granted to the petitioner to come before this Court after filing of charge-sheet. He further submits that charge-sheet has been filed and the co-accused Narendra Kumar and Vikas have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 20.04.2023 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Bail Applications No.4042/2023 and 4363/2023.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor does not dispute the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and the co-accused have been enlarged on bail.

¶14

[CRLMB-4904/2023]

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.

¶17

This Court, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case and looking to the fact that the trial will take long time, is of the opinion that the second bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶18

Consequently, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that petitioner Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Daya Ram, shall be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR; provided he executes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Petitioner shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J

¶20

32-amit/-

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kavita Gangwani Vs State of Rajasthan

Gram Panchayat Butiwas Vs State of Raj. and Ors.

Pappuram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rekha @ Karamchari Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhiya Ram Punia Vs State and Ors.