Allowed

Roop Singh @ Ravi S/O Om Bihari v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2023CRLMB/425/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows an anticipatory bail application lodged by Roop Singh during mandatory police custody. The single-judge bench set him on bail despite his inability to appear for the first hearing due to custody, noting that bail cannot be denied merely for non-appearance in such circumstances.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and is directed to deposit his bond surety and appear before the Court as ordered.

Roop Singh @ Ravi S/O Om Bihari Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 425/2023

¶3

Roop Singh @ Ravi S/o Om Bihari, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Surve Number 5/210, Tila Nagar 05, Kachi Basti Police Station Jawahar Nagar Jaipur ( Presently He Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

Sunita D/o Kailash Bairwa, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Survey Number 5/210, Tila Nagar 05, Kachi Basti Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur District Jaipur Metropolitan, Rajasthan.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

_____________ For Petitioner(s)	_______ : Jh fe-	__________________________ fu'kkUr 'kekZ o 'kf'kckyk tSu
For Respondent(s) ______________	: Jh _______	'ksjflag egyk] yksd vfHk;kstd __________________________

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

17-01-2023

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 22-12-2022 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk mls iqfyl Fkkuk vkn'kZ uxj] t;iqj 'kgj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 109@2021 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 376 ¼2½¼,u½ Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 05¼,y½¼ts½¼ii½@/kkjk&06 ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e 2012] /kkjk 3¼1½¼MCY;w½¼i½] /kkjk 3¼2½¼v½ vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr vR;kpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZ A

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-425/2023]

¶16

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ etnwjh is'kk O;fDr gS tks [kkus dekus 'kgj ls ckgj pyk x;k Fkk rFkk mls fu;r rkjh[k is'kh dh tkudkjh ugha gks ldh blfy, og fnukad 03-08-2022 dks U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr ugha gks ldkA izkFkhZ dh vuqifLFkfr ln~Hkkoh gS] og fnukad 19-12-2022 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dk pkj ekg dk csy tEi gS] blls igys dHkh Hkh izkFkhZ dh tekur tIr ugha gqbZ gS] ekeys dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij NksM+k tkos A

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k A

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkZs ij fopkj fd;k x;k gS o izLrqr nLrkostksa dk voyksdu fd;k x;k gS A ftlls ;g izdV gS fd ftl fnu izkFkhZ vfHk;qDr csy tEi gqvk ml fnu ihfMrk ds c;ku ys[kc) gksus Fks ijUrq izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr ugha gksus ls ihfM+rk ds c;ku ys[kc) ugha gks ik;s] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa bl Lrj ij izkFkhZ@ vfHk;qDr dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶19

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr :i flag mQZ jfo iq= vkse fcgkjh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gS A

¶20

v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa ihfM+rk ds c;ku ys[kc) gksus ds i'pkr~ izkFkhZ @vfHk;qDr iqu% tekur vkosnu izLrqr djus gsrq Lora= gksxk A

¶21

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶22

Rishikesh Soni/111

Roop Singh @ Ravi S/O Om Bihari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Roop Singh @ Ravi S/O Om Bihari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitendra Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Hema Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar S/O Ridhkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Phoolwati W/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Matram Son of Shri Manguram Vs State of Rajasthan