Allowed

Matram Son of Shri Manguram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2023CRLMB/405/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

HC of Rajasthan at Jaipur granted bail to Matram Son of Shri Manguram in Session Case regarding offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, requiring the petitioner to furnish a financial bond and deposit sum in High Court custody.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted by the petitioner furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- as personal bond and Rs. 25,000/- as surety bond in advance of the High Court.

Matram Son of Shri Manguram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 405/2023

¶3

Matram Son Of Shri Manguram, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Tarwala Police Station Kishangarhbas District Alwar, At Present In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Sh. Namo Narayan Meena and Sh. A. Khan for Sh. Harendra singh. For Respondent(s) : S.S. Mahla, P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶10

Order

¶11

17/01/2023

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ekrjke iq= eaxqjke dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 07-01-2023 ds fo:) ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk fHkokM+h Qst r`rh;] ftyk vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 163@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk0na0la0 esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd, tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

cgl lquh xbZA

¶14

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks ekeys esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og funksZ"k gSA izdj.k esa vkjksi i= is”k gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr yacs le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA ekeys dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶15

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-405/2023]

¶17

nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdksZa] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; ,oa vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶18

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ekrjke iq= eaxqjke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i,½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk”k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is”kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ekrjke iq= eaxqjke dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa okafNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶19

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶20

AD/110

Matram Son of Shri Manguram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Matram Son of Shri Manguram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitendra Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Hema Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar S/O Ridhkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Roop Singh @ Ravi S/O Om Bihari Vs State of Rajasthan

Phoolwati W/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan