Allowed

Vijay Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Apr 2023CRLMB/31/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought anticipatory bail facing charges under various IPC sections and PDPP Act. The High Court allowed the application, directing release on personal bond if arrested.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on anticipatory bail to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Vijay Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma Vs… — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/005799]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 31/2023

¶4

Vijay Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Khaniya Wali Kothi, Village Hathoda, Police Station Chomu, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

05/04/2023

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.771/2022 registered at Police Station Chomu, Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 186, 332, 353, 336 IPC and Section 3 PDPP Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is ready to co-operate in the investigation. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶17

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The

[2023/RJJP/005799]

[CRLMB-31/2023]

(2 of 2)

S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Chomu, Jaipur (West) in F.I.R. No.771/2022 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Vijay Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶26

Jatin/114

Vijay Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurumoorti Hantal S/O Laxmandhar Hantal @ Laxmi Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi @ Veeru Chaudhary S/O Sharvan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagwati Dayal Sharma S/O Chiranji Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Badri Son of Ratna Vs State of Rajasthan

Sameer @ Sageer @ Totta S/O Sayeduddin Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Kanta W/O Dharmveer Vs State of Rajasthan