Single judge of Rajasthan High Court dismissed Section 438 Cr.P.C. application. Held case not fit for anticipatory bail due to gravity of offence, requirement of custodial interrogation, and lack of cooperation in investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/005588]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 335/2023
Bhagwati Dayal Sharma S/o Chiranji Lal, R/o Gali No. 1, Near D.c. Park, Mohata Garden, Sirsa, Harayana
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP For Complainant(s) : Mr. J. K. Moolchandani, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Bhandari, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
04/04/2023
[2023/RJJP/005588]
[CRLMB-335/2023]
(2 of 2)
co-accused had cheated the complainant and taken Rs.5 lacs from him. Petitioner had not co-operated in the investigation. So, his bail be dismissed.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin/66
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is fit for anticipatory bail in a cheating case involving creation of a fake firm.
Whether custodial interrogation is required for the petitioner to establish his innocence.
Bhagwati Dayal Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
