Allowed

Sameer @ Sageer @ Totta S/O Sayeduddin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Apr 2023CRLMB/1071/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice N.S. Dhaddha allowed the bail application of Sameer @ Sageer @ Totta, a petitioner confined in Central Jail Jaipur, accused of robbery and custodial rape under IPC Sections 323, 384, and 376(2)(n), granting him bail subject to personal bond and sureties with a stipulation to appear in the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Sameer @ Sageer @ Totta S/O Sayeduddin Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1071/2023

¶3

Sameer @ Sageer @ Totta S/o Sayeduddin, Resident Of House No. 4/324, Bilochpura, Lohamandi, Agra, Uttar Pradesh. Presently Residing At 19336, Aamagarh, Vaidpuri Private Bus Stand Ke Pass, Police Station Transport Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv. For State : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP For Complainant(s) : None Present

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order

¶10

05/04/2023

¶11

The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.300/2022 Registered at Police Station Bharampuri, Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) under Sections 323, 384 and 376(2)(n) IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 06.01.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that during trial, prosecutrix has not supported the prosecution story and she turned hostile. Conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

[CRLMB-1071/2023]

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sameer @ Sageer @ Totta S/o Sayeduddin be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he will appear before the trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶18

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶19

Gourav/08

Sameer @ Sageer @ Totta S/O Sayeduddin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sameer @ Sageer @ Totta S/O Sayeduddin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurumoorti Hantal S/O Laxmandhar Hantal @ Laxmi Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi @ Veeru Chaudhary S/O Sharvan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagwati Dayal Sharma S/O Chiranji Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Badri Son of Ratna Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Kanta W/O Dharmveer Vs State of Rajasthan