Petitioner filed a bail application but did not appear to argue or press the matter. The High Court dismissed the application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/007518]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12487/2022
Vikas @ Pariyo S/o Shri Madanlal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Sanju, Police Station Degana, District Nagaur. (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail, Merta City)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Pappu Sangwa |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
SK Bhati,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
27/03/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner, without arguing the matter on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
55-mohit/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas @ Pariyo
State Of Rajasthan
Sarda Devi
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
