The high court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Satveer challenging the bail status in a Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled Tribes atrocities case. The court refused bail extension, citing the gravity of the offences and the prior decision on merits based on eye witness statement.
The criminal appeal is dismissed; bail not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2102/2022
Satveer @ Farra S/o Lekhram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kankra Ps Kishangarbas Distt. Alwar (Accused In Sub District Jail Kishangarhbas)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. R. R. Goyal Adv. |
|---|---|
| For State | : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP |
| For Complainant(s) | : None Present |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
12/04/2023
[CRLAS-2102/2022]
(2 of 2)
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Gourav/04
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant is fit to be enlarged on bail considering previous appeal decided on merits and gravity of offence.
Whether the evidence of the eye witness PW-10 is reliable to sustain the conclusion that the appellant inflicted fatal injury.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Satveer @ Farra S/o Lekhram
State Of Rajasthan
Imrati W/o Yadram
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
