Kunaram v. Bhinyaram
Case brief
What is this about?
In a S.B. Civil Restoration application, the High Court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's failure to remove defects pointed out by the office, resulting in a bar of limitation and non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The restoration application is dismissed in non-compliance and non-prosecution.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 83/2018
- Kunaram S/o Natharam, by caste- Mali, resident of Biratiya Kallan, Bera Bhatiyan Wala, Tehsil- Raipur, District Pali (Rajasthan)
----Petitioners
Versus
- Bhinyaram S/o Gopuram, aged- 56 years, by casteKumawat (Mavar), resident of Samoukhi, Tehsil- Jaitaran, District- Pali (Rajasthan)
- Smt. Chandraki Devi W/o Bhiyaram, Aged About 50 Years, B/c Kumawat (Mavar), R/o Samoukhi, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali
- Bastiram S/o Hemaram, B/c Jat, R/o Khinyala, TehsilJayal, District - Nagaur
- Bhagirath S/o Bhikaram, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Chirkani, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the restoration application should be dismissed for non-removal of defects despite multiple extensions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kunaram S/o Natharam
- respondent
Bhinyaram S/o Gopuram
- respondent
Chandraki Devi W/o Bhiyaram
- respondent
Bastiram S/o Hemaram
- respondent
Bhagirath S/o Bhikaram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRES/83/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court